Source code for wemake_python_styleguide.violations.consistency

# -*- coding: utf-8 -*-

"""
These checks limit the Python's inconsistency.

We can do the same things differently in Python.
For example, there are three ways to format a string.
There are several ways to write the same number.

We like our code to be consistent.
It is easier to bare with your code base if you follow these rules.

So, we choose a single way to do things.
It does not mean that we choose the best way to do it.
But, we value consistency more than being 100% right.
And we are ready to suffer all trade-offs that might come.

Once again, these rules are highly subjective. But, we love them.

.. currentmodule:: wemake_python_styleguide.violations.consistency

Summary
-------

.. autosummary::
   :nosignatures:

   LocalFolderImportViolation
   DottedRawImportViolation
   UnicodeStringViolation
   UnderscoredNumberViolation
   PartialFloatViolation
   FormattedStringViolation
   RequiredBaseClassViolation
   MultipleIfsInComprehensionViolation
   ConstantComparisonViolation
   BadNumberSuffixViolation
   ComparisonOrderViolation
   MultipleInComparisonViolation
   RedundantComparisonViolation
   MissingSpaceBetweenKeywordAndParenViolation
   WrongConditionalViolation
   ObjectInBaseClassesListViolation

Consistency checks
------------------

.. autoclass:: LocalFolderImportViolation
.. autoclass:: DottedRawImportViolation
.. autoclass:: UnicodeStringViolation
.. autoclass:: UnderscoredNumberViolation
.. autoclass:: PartialFloatViolation
.. autoclass:: FormattedStringViolation
.. autoclass:: RequiredBaseClassViolation
.. autoclass:: MultipleIfsInComprehensionViolation
.. autoclass:: ConstantComparisonViolation
.. autoclass:: BadNumberSuffixViolation
.. autoclass:: ComparisonOrderViolation
.. autoclass:: MultipleInComparisonViolation
.. autoclass:: RedundantComparisonViolation
.. autoclass:: MissingSpaceBetweenKeywordAndParenViolation
.. autoclass:: WrongConditionalViolation
.. autoclass:: ObjectInBaseClassesListViolation

"""

from wemake_python_styleguide.types import final
from wemake_python_styleguide.violations.base import (
    ASTViolation,
    TokenizeViolation,
)


[docs]@final class LocalFolderImportViolation(ASTViolation): """ Forbids to have imports relative to the current folder. Reasoning: We should pick one style and stick to it. We have decided to use the explicit one. Solution: Refactor your imports to use the absolute path. Example:: # Correct: from my_package.version import get_version # Wrong: from .version import get_version from ..drivers import MySQLDriver .. versionadded:: 0.1.0 Note: Returns Z300 as error code """ should_use_text = False #: Error message shown to the user. error_template = 'Found local folder import' code = 300
[docs]@final class DottedRawImportViolation(ASTViolation): """ Forbids to use imports like ``import os.path``. Reasoning: There too many different ways to import something. We should pick one style and stick to it. We have decided to use the readable one. Solution: Refactor your import statement. Example:: # Correct: from os import path # Wrong: import os.path .. versionadded:: 0.1.0 Note: Returns Z301 as error code """ #: Error message shown to the user. error_template = 'Found dotted raw import: {0}' code = 301
[docs]@final class UnicodeStringViolation(TokenizeViolation): """ Forbids to use ``u`` string prefix. Reasoning: We do not need this prefix since ``python2``. But, it is still possible to find it inside the codebase. Solution: Remove this prefix. Example:: # Correct: nickname = 'sobolevn' file_contents = b'aabbcc' # Wrong: nickname = u'sobolevn' .. versionadded:: 0.1.0 Note: Returns Z302 as error code """ code = 302 #: Error message shown to the user. error_template = 'Found unicode string prefix: {0}'
[docs]@final class UnderscoredNumberViolation(TokenizeViolation): """ Forbids to use underscores (``_``) in numbers. Reasoning: It is possible to write ``1000`` in three different ways: ``1_000``, ``10_00``, and ``100_0``. And it would be still the same number. Count how many ways there are to write bigger numbers. Currently, it all depends on cultural habits of the author. We enforce a single way to write numbers: without the underscore. Solution: Numbers should be written as numbers: ``1000``. If you have a very big number with a lot of zeros, use multiplication. Example:: # Correct: phone = 88313443 million = 1000000 # Wrong: phone = 8_83_134_43 million = 100_00_00 .. versionadded:: 0.1.0 Note: Returns Z303 as error code """ code = 303 #: Error message shown to the user. error_template = 'Found underscored number: {0}'
[docs]@final class PartialFloatViolation(TokenizeViolation): """ Forbids to use partial floats like ``.05`` or ``23.``. Reasoning: Partial numbers are hard to read and they can be confused with other numbers. For example, it is really easy to confuse ``0.5`` and ``.05`` when reading through the source code. Solution: Use full versions with leading and starting zeros. Example:: # Correct: half = 0.5 ten_float = 10.0 # Wrong: half = .5 ten_float = 10. .. versionadded:: 0.1.0 Note: Returns Z304 as error code """ code = 304 #: Error message shown to the user. error_template = 'Found partial float: {0}'
[docs]@final class FormattedStringViolation(ASTViolation): """ Forbids to use ``f`` strings. Reasoning: ``f`` strings looses context too often and they are hard to lint. Imagine that you have a string that breaks when you move it two lines above. That's not how a string should behave. Also, they promote a bad practice: putting your logic inside the template. Solution: Use ``.format()`` with indexed params instead. See also: https://github.com/xZise/flake8-string-format Example:: # Wrong: f'Result is: {2 + 2}' # Correct: 'Result is: {0}'.format(2 + 2) 'Hey {user}! How are you?'.format(user='sobolevn') .. versionadded:: 0.1.0 Note: Returns Z305 as error code """ should_use_text = False #: Error message shown to the user. error_template = 'Found `f` string' code = 305
[docs]@final class RequiredBaseClassViolation(ASTViolation): """ Forbids to write classes without base classes. Reasoning: We just need to decide how to do it. We need a single and unified rule about base classes. We have decided to stick to the explicit base class notation. Solution: Add a base class. Example:: # Correct: class Some(object): ... # Wrong: class Some: ... .. versionadded:: 0.1.0 Note: Returns Z306 as error code """ #: Error message shown to the user. error_template = 'Found class without a base class: {0}' code = 306
[docs]@final class MultipleIfsInComprehensionViolation(ASTViolation): """ Forbids to have multiple ``if`` statements inside list comprehensions. Reasoning: It is very hard to read multiple ``if`` statements inside a list comprehension. Since, it is even hard to tell all of them should pass or fail. Solution: Use a single ``if`` statement inside list comprehensions. Use ``filter()`` if you have complicated logic. Example:: # Wrong: nodes = [node for node in html if node != 'b' if node != 'i'] # Correct: nodes = [node for node in html if node not in ('b', 'i')] .. versionadded:: 0.1.0 Note: Returns Z307 as error code """ should_use_text = False #: Error message shown to the user. error_template = 'Found list comprehension with multiple `if`s' code = 307
[docs]@final class ConstantComparisonViolation(ASTViolation): """ Forbids to have comparisons between two literals. Reasoning: When two constants are compared it is typically an indication of a mistake, since the Boolean value of the comparison will always be the same. Solution: Remove the constant comparison and any associated dead code. Example:: # Wrong: if 60 * 60 < 1000: do_something() else: do_something_else() # Correct: do_something_else() .. versionadded:: 0.3.0 Note: Returns Z308 as error code """ should_use_text = False #: Error message shown to the user. error_template = 'Found constant comparison' code = 308
[docs]@final class ComparisonOrderViolation(ASTViolation): """ Forbids comparision where argument doesn't come first. Reasoning: It is hard to read the code when you have to shuffle ordering of the arguments all the time. Bring a consistency to the comparison! Solution: Refactor your comparison expression, place the argument first. Example:: # Correct: if some_x > 3: if 3 < some_x < 10: # Wrong: if 3 < some_x: .. versionadded:: 0.3.0 Note: Returns Z309 as error code """ should_use_text = False #: Error message shown to the user. error_template = 'Found reversed comparison order' code = 309
[docs]@final class BadNumberSuffixViolation(TokenizeViolation): """ Forbids to use capital ``X``, ``O``, ``B``, and ``E`` in numbers. Reasoning: Octal, hex, binary and scientific notation suffixes could be written in two possible notations: lowercase and uppercase. Which brings confusion and decreases code consistency and readability. We enforce a single way to write numbers with suffixes: suffix with lowercase chars. Solution: Octal, hex, binary and scientific notation suffixes in numbers should be written lowercase. Example:: # Correct: hex_number = 0xFF octal_number = 0o11 binary_number = 0b1001 number_with_scientific_notation = 1.5e+10 # Wrong: hex_number = 0XFF octal_number = 0O11 binary_number = 0B1001 number_with_scientific_notation = 1.5E+10 .. versionadded:: 0.3.0 Note: Returns Z310 as error code """ #: Error message shown to the user. error_template = 'Found bad number suffix: {0}' code = 310
[docs]@final class MultipleInComparisonViolation(ASTViolation): """ Forbids comparision where multiple ``in`` checks. Reasoning: Using multiple ``in`` is unreadable. Solution: Refactor your comparison expression to use several ``and`` conditions or separate ``if`` statements in case it is appropriate. Example:: # Correct: if item in bucket and bucket in master_list_of_buckets: if x_coord in line and line in square: # Wrong: if item in bucket in master_list_of_buckets: if x_cord in line in square: .. versionadded:: 0.3.0 Note: Returns Z311 as error code """ should_use_text = False #: Error message shown to the user. error_template = 'Found multiple `in` comparisons' code = 311
[docs]@final class RedundantComparisonViolation(ASTViolation): """ Forbids to have comparisons between the same variable. Reasoning: When the same variables are compared it is typically an indication of a mistake, since the Boolean value of the comparison will always be the same. Solution: Remove the same variable comparison and any associated dead code. Example:: # Wrong: a = 1 if a < a: do_something() else: do_something_else() # Correct: do_something() .. versionadded:: 0.3.0 Note: Returns Z312 as error code """ should_use_text = False #: Error message shown to the user. error_template = 'Found comparison between same variable' code = 312
[docs]@final class MissingSpaceBetweenKeywordAndParenViolation(TokenizeViolation): """ Forbid opening parenthesis from following keyword without space in between. Reasoning: Some people use ``return`` and ``yield`` keywords as functions. The same happened to good old ``print`` in Python2. Solution: Insert space symbol between keyword and open paren. Example:: # Wrong: def func(): a = 1 b = 2 del(a, b) yield(1, 2, 3) # Correct: def func(): a = 1 del (a, b) yield (1, 2, 3) .. versionadded:: 0.3.0 Note: Returns Z313 as error code """ should_use_text = False #: Error message shown to the user. error_template = 'Found parens right after a keyword' code = 313
[docs]class WrongConditionalViolation(ASTViolation): """ Forbids using ``if`` statements that use invalid conditionals. Reasoning: When invalid conditional arguments are used it is typically an indication of a mistake, since the value of the conditional result will always be the same. Solution: Remove the conditional and any associated dead code. Example:: # Correct: if value is True: ... # Wrong: if True: ... .. versionadded:: 0.3.0 Note: Returns Z314 as error code """ should_use_text = False #: Error message shown to the user. error_template = 'Conditional always evaluates to same result' code = 314
[docs]class ObjectInBaseClassesListViolation(ASTViolation): """ Forbid extra ``object`` in parent classes list. Reasoning: We should allow object only when we explicitly use it as a single parent class. When there is an other class or there are multiple parents - we should not allow it for the consistency reasons. Solution: Remove extra ``object`` parent class from the list. Example:: # Correct: class SomeClassName(object): ... class SomeClassName(FirstParentClass, SecondParentClass): ... # Wrong: class SomeClassName(FirstParentClass, SecondParentClass, object): ... .. versionadded:: 0.3.0 Note: Returns Z315 as error code """ should_use_text = False #: Error message shown to the user error_template = 'Founded extra `object` in parent classes list' code = 315